Lies Upon Lies

Another of my operating principles is that the more you are told you may not question a historical event, period or person, the more likely it is that what you have been told is a lie. Some obvious contemporary examples:

• The Las Vegas shooting

• The Covid-19 “vaccine”

• The death of George Floyd

• The real story of 9/11/2001

Those are relatively small events compared to the big one:

World War II

World War II comes up quite often as it is the pivotal event of the 20th century and the ramifications of those events continue to impact the world and will likely do so for long after I am dead and gone. Of course the Second World War, or perhaps more accurately the First World War continued after a brief intermission, also includes THE Signature Event In All Of Human History™.

One of the, surely intended, consequences of retconning World War II to be all about “The Holocaust” is that now anything and everything having to do with Germany in the 1930s/1940s, National Socialism in general and of course Adolf Hitler in particular, has been turned into the epitome of everything bad. No matter the subject, if you don’t like what someone is saying the solution is to call them a Nazi or fascist, regardless of the fact that virtually none of the people who employ this tactic could tell you the first thing about fascism or National Socialism other than “It was the baddest thing ever in the history of Bad Things”.

Making this worse is the normiecon insistence on playing this game despite it being a game they cannot win. You cannot out Reductio ad Hitlerum a leftist.

One of the most common examples is gun control. Normiecons will claim that gun control is bad because dictators often seized the guns of citizens and first and foremost was Moustache Man Bad. It is an article of faith for normiecons that Hitler is the ultimate gun grabber.

The problem is that it simply isn’t true.

A number of us asked Zoomer Historian on Twitter to do a video about this topic and he obliged.

Did Germany under the Reich have the sort of gun laws we have in many states today? Well no, of course not. Germany has never had a Second Amendment, no other nation really does. It was however a pretty open system of gun ownership for the German people especially. It was not so for the Jews and there are reasons for that.

There is a term Zoomer Historian uses a couple of times in reference to Jews: “untrustworthy foreigners”. The Third Reich didn’t consider Jews to be Germans. Like most nations where Jews have dwelled for thousands of years, often before being booted for being bad guests, They were considered a foreign presence in the nation rather than natives of that nation. What is more, They generally don’t even consider Themselves to be natives of a nation. Notice how many American Jews maintain a dual-citizenship. Jews in America, not all but many/most, consider Their own ethnic solidarity and the safety of Their ethnostate to take precedence over what is best for America and the American people. The value of America is not America itself but what it can for Them and for Israel.

Understandably a nationalistic nation that prioritizes the Volk over anyone else and that sees Jews as untrustworthy foreigners doesn’t have an interest in allowing a potentially hostile group to be armed within the German nation. I would be absolutely in favor of interpreting the Second Amendment to only apply to native born American citizens. It ought not apply to people here “legally” who are not Americans. No American should want a potentially hostile group of untrustworthy foreigners, whether Jews or Africans or mestizos, to be armed within our borders.

For average actual Germans in Germany under the Reich? Gun ownership was pretty common and was actually more liberal under the Nazis than it was under the Weimar Republic. When it comes to guns, Hitler was nothing like Stalin or Mao. Sorry normiecons.

Something else ZH said: “Hitler didn’t disarm the Germans, the Allies did, twice”. I have recounted before but the man I am named after used to tell us about his time in Germany after the war ended where he and other engineers would use bulldozers to crush enormous piles of privately owned firearms including many that he described as being museum pieces (matchlock rifles, fancy double barreled shotguns, etc). The U.S. as part of crushing Germany didn’t merely employ concentration camps and starvation leading to the deaths of countless German civilians but did everything it could to destroy Germany as a nation. It seems to have worked as Germany slowly allows itself to be overrun by a different group of untrustworthy foreigners, an invasion being aided and abetted by the same old group of untrustworthy foreigners that cause so much trouble everywhere They go.

Here are a few more Third Reich myth-busting videos I liked from Zoomer Historian. My point is not to convince people of the virtues of National Socialism but instead to reinforce how much we have been lied to about this time period. If They lie about stuff like this, you know They are lying about most everything else.

The “Blue eyes and blonde hair” myth….

The book burning myth (note my position is that some books, and some authors, should be burned)…